OB/GYN SEO Tactical Playbook

SEO for OB/GYN Practices: What Actually Ranks in 2026

OB/GYN SEO is one of the trickiest medical specialty SEO disciplines — not because the tactics are harder, but because most of the patient routing happens outside of search entirely. In most markets, 60–80% of new OB/GYN patients arrive through insurance assignment, referral chains, or hospital system routing rather than independent Google search. The SEO strategy that works isn’t the one that fights for “OB/GYN near me” against Kaiser, Sutter, Adventist, and three other hospital-owned systems — it’s the one that captures the specific patient segments who DO self-direct. Cash-pay menopause and HRT patients. Fibroid patients researching options before surgery. Pelvic prolapse patients evaluating urogynecology. Patients seeking second opinions on hysterectomy alternatives. Aesthetic gynecology patients. Adolescent gynecology referrals. The practice that builds substantive content for these self-directing segments meaningfully outperforms practices that try to compete with hospital systems for generic OB/GYN visibility. This is the tactical playbook — what ranks for OB/GYN practices in 2026, where to invest, where not to, and the specific implementation that produces patient flow in 6–12 months.

Why OB/GYN SEO Is Its Own Discipline

The structural problem most OB/GYN private practices face: in most US markets, general OB/GYN patient routing is insurance-driven, not search-driven. A pregnant patient with Anthem Blue Cross usually picks from her in-network OB list, not from Google search results. A patient needing an annual well-woman exam typically continues with whoever she saw last year or whoever her primary care doctor referred her to. The Maps Pack for “OB/GYN near me” is dominated by hospital-owned systems with marketing budgets independent practices can’t match.

This produces a common pattern: OB/GYN practices invest in generic SEO, watch flat traffic, conclude SEO doesn’t work for their specialty, and cut investment. The conclusion is half-right (generic OB/GYN SEO targeting insurance-routed patients does usually underperform) and half-wrong (specific OB/GYN SEO targeting self-directing patient segments works reliably).

The OB/GYN practices that grow through SEO in 2026 share a pattern. They’ve identified the specific patient segments who self-direct rather than route through insurance, and they’ve built substantive content for those segments specifically. Three segments matter most.

Cash-pay specialty services. Menopause and perimenopause management. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT, BHRT). Aesthetic gynecology. Sexual health. Hair restoration. Bioidentical hormones. Concierge gynecology. Cash-pay patients don’t consult their insurance directory — they Google, read, compare, and book. Cash-pay LTV ranges $1,500–$8,000+ per patient with strong repeat economics. The SEO ROI math works dramatically.

Procedure-specific patient research. Patients facing fibroids, endometriosis, ovarian cysts, pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, abnormal bleeding, hysterectomy alternatives, myomectomy options, or LEEP procedures research extensively before scheduling surgery. They Google “myomectomy vs hysterectomy,” “non-surgical fibroid treatment options,” “robotic gynecologic surgery,” “mesh prolapse repair vs native tissue.” This is high-intent commercial research that hospital system websites typically address with thin generic content. The OB/GYN practice with substantive procedure-specific content captures this traffic and converts it to consultations.

Sub-specialty self-direction. Patients seeking urogynecology (FPMRS), maternal fetal medicine (MFM), gynecologic oncology, adolescent gynecology, or REI (reproductive endocrinology) increasingly self-direct rather than wait for primary OB/GYN referral. The patient with stress urinary incontinence often searches “urogynecologist near me” before her PCP brings it up. Sub-specialty practices that compete for these searches with substantive content capture a meaningfully growing patient segment.

The SEO strategy that works isn’t fighting hospital systems for generic visibility — it’s building authority in the specific sub-segments where patients self-direct. Practices that make this strategic pivot typically see meaningful traffic and patient flow improvements within 6–9 months.

The 5 Ranking Signals That Drive OB/GYN SEO

1. Sub-specialty entity specificity. Search systems and AI extraction systems differentiate between general OB/GYN practices and sub-specialty-credentialed practices. Board certification status (ABOG), sub-specialty fellowship credentials (FPMRS, MFM, GynOnc, REI), Society of Gynecologic Surgeons membership, North American Menopause Society Certified Menopause Practitioner (NCMP) certification, AAGL (advanced gynecologic surgery) fellowship, and specific procedure certifications (da Vinci robotic surgery, MyoSure, NovaSure, etc.) all factor into how search systems weight content authority. Build clean entity signals: ABOG certification verifiable, sub-specialty certifications named with issuing organization, NPI taxonomy correctly tagged (207V00000X for OB/GYN, 207VF0040X for FPMRS, 207VM0101X for MFM, 207VX0201X for GynOnc, 207VE0102X for REI), and professional society memberships listed.

2. Procedure and condition page depth. Substantive pages for each major procedure and condition rank for procedure-specific queries, get cited by AI search systems, and build the topical authority that lifts the entire site. Generic “women’s health services” pages with 600 words covering everything don’t rank against substantive condition-specific and procedure-specific pages from sub-specialty practices.

3. Patient-decision content for self-directing segments. Content addressing the specific decisions self-directing patients make — “myomectomy vs hysterectomy,” “HRT vs no HRT for perimenopause,” “mesh vs native tissue prolapse repair,” “LEEP vs cold knife cone biopsy,” “when to see a urogynecologist” — ranks for high-intent comparison queries that generic women’s health content misses. The patient researching whether she needs surgery is the patient who self-directs and converts to consultation.

4. AI search citation for women’s health. Women’s health queries are among the heaviest AI search categories — especially menopause, perimenopause, HRT, fibroid options, endometriosis, PCOS, and pelvic pain. 40–60% of women’s health research queries route partially or entirely through ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. Practices not optimized for AI citation are invisible to a meaningful share of patient research.

5. Local Pack for sub-specialty terms. “Urogynecologist near me,” “menopause specialist [city],” “fibroid specialist [city],” and similar sub-specialty queries produce meaningful patient flow through Local Pack visibility. Hospital systems often don’t compete strongly in these niches, leaving the Local Pack accessible to private practices that build it intentionally. Different from the generic “OB/GYN near me” pack where hospital systems dominate.

Get a free audit →

The OB/GYN Content Architecture That Actually Ranks

Cluster 1: Menopause and hormone therapy (highest-leverage cash-pay)

The single highest-leverage OB/GYN SEO cluster in 2026. Menopause and perimenopause patients self-direct intensely, increasingly evaluate cash-pay specialty care, and have $2,500–$8,000+ LTV per patient through sustained HRT management. Build substantive pages for: perimenopause symptoms and treatment (2,000–3,000 words), hormone replacement therapy options (1,800–3,000 words covering bioidentical vs synthetic, oral vs transdermal, estrogen-only vs combined), HRT safety and contraindications (1,500–2,500), low libido and sexual health in menopause, vasomotor symptoms management, vaginal dryness and GSM treatment, osteoporosis prevention, perimenopause vs menopause distinction. NAMS Certified Menopause Practitioner (NCMP) credential strongly weighted by both search systems and AI citation for this cluster.

Cluster 2: Fibroids, endometriosis, and gynecologic surgery alternatives

High-intent procedure research cluster. Patients facing potential surgery research extensively before scheduling. Build substantive pages for: uterine fibroids overview and treatment options (2,500–3,500 words), myomectomy vs hysterectomy decision content, laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE), MRI-guided focused ultrasound, endometriosis diagnosis and treatment (2,000–3,000 words), excision vs ablation for endometriosis, robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery, single-incision laparoscopy, minimally invasive surgical approaches. AAGL (American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists) credentialing matters for ranking and patient trust.

Cluster 3: Pelvic floor and urogynecology (FPMRS)

For practices with FPMRS-credentialed providers or FPMRS-board-certified urogynecologists. Substantive pages for: pelvic organ prolapse evaluation and treatment, mesh vs native tissue repair, sacrocolpopexy, anterior and posterior repair, urinary incontinence types and treatment, stress incontinence and slings, urge incontinence and overactive bladder, pessary fitting, pelvic floor physical therapy, sexual dysfunction after childbirth. FPMRS is increasingly searched by self-directing patients who recognize they need sub-specialty care.

Cluster 4: Aesthetic and sexual health gynecology

Cash-pay cluster with strong economics. Substantive pages for: labiaplasty and external aesthetic procedures (where offered with proper credentialing), vaginal rejuvenation (laser-based options like MonaLisa Touch, ThermiVa where offered), O-Shot and P-Shot procedures, treatment for sexual dysfunction, GSM treatment beyond systemic HRT, hair restoration for menopausal hair changes. Sensitive content; tone matters. Aesthetic gynecology requires careful HIPAA-compliant patient testimonial and before/after content with explicit consent.

Cluster 5: Obstetric content (selective)

For practices that deliver babies. Substantive content for: high-risk pregnancy management (where MFM is available), VBAC eligibility and considerations, pregnancy complications (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, placental issues), prenatal care timeline, fetal monitoring options, birth plan considerations, postpartum care, postpartum depression screening and treatment, lactation support. Obstetric SEO is more constrained because patient routing remains heavily insurance-driven, but the depth content still ranks and converts the patients who do self-direct (especially for high-risk pregnancy where MFM credentialing matters).

Cluster 6: Annual exam, contraception, well-woman (lowest priority)

Generic women’s health content. Lowest SEO leverage because patients in these categories are largely insurance-routed. Build minimal content here — one substantive page per topic for basic search coverage, but don’t over-invest. Most SEO budget should go to clusters 1–4 where self-directing patients exist.

Provider Authority: The OB/GYN Entity Layer

Provider authority signals matter for OB/GYN ranking because patients evaluate “general OB/GYN vs sub-specialty” and “board-certified OB/GYN vs hospital system staff physician” throughout the comparison process. The practice that builds clean provider entity signals wins both the patient comparison and the AI citation comparison.

The substantive OB/GYN provider page needs 1,200–2,500 words covering: opening factual paragraph with name, ABOG board certification (and date), sub-specialty certifications if applicable (FPMRS, MFM, GynOnc, REI, NCMP), fellowship program named with institution, years of practice, hospital affiliations; education and training section with medical school, OB/GYN residency program (named, with year), fellowship if applicable, continuing education and additional certifications (da Vinci robotic surgery, NAMS Certified Menopause Practitioner, AAGL credentialing, specific procedure trainings); clinical philosophy and approach; areas of clinical focus; professional memberships (ACOG, AAGL, NAMS, AUGS, SMFM, peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations).

The provider entity verification ecosystem for OB/GYNs: NPI registry with correct taxonomy (207V00000X for general OB/GYN; sub-specialty codes for FPMRS, MFM, GynOnc, REI); ABOG board certification verifiable; sub-specialty board certification verifiable; ACOG Fellow status; AAGL membership (for surgical practices); NAMS membership and NCMP certification (for menopause practices); AUGS membership (for urogynecology); hospital staff appointments; Healthgrades and Vitals OB/GYN specialty profiles; ZocDoc; state medical board verification.

Consistency across this ecosystem produces meaningful entity strength that compounds AI citation and search ranking over years.

AI Search Citation for OB/GYN Practices

Women’s health queries are among the heaviest AI search categories in healthcare. Patients researching menopause, perimenopause, HRT, fibroids, endometriosis, PCOS, pelvic pain, urinary incontinence, and many other gynecologic conditions increasingly use ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews as primary research tools. The AI search behavior is particularly strong for stigmatized or sensitive topics where patients want information without the friction of asking a doctor first.

Why women’s health AI search adoption is high: Many women’s health topics have been historically under-served by primary care. Patients with vague pelvic pain, perimenopausal symptoms, sexual dysfunction, or abnormal bleeding often spent years getting dismissed before reaching the right specialist. AI search assistants provide informational research without the gatekeeping. Women researching these conditions are often the most self-directing patient segment in medicine.

The signals that drive AI citation for OB/GYN: Strong specialty and sub-specialty entity signals across the medical directory ecosystem. Substantive provider authority content (1,200–2,500 words per OB/GYN). Condition and procedure pages with citation-friendly structure (direct-answer paragraphs, question-as-heading H2/H3, FAQPage schema). Original outcome content with HIPAA-compliant aggregation where appropriate. llms.txt configuration explicitly allowing GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended. Sustained reputation density on Google, Healthgrades, ZocDoc, and women’s health-specific platforms.

Realistic timeline: OB/GYN practices that execute the schema, content depth, and entity strengthening work above typically begin appearing in AI citations within 60–120 days. Sustained citation visibility on standard women’s health queries typically establishes at 6–12 months. First-mover advantage is meaningful through 2026 because few OB/GYN practices are actively optimizing for AI citation.

For the broader medical AI search optimization framework, read How to Optimize Your Medical Practice Website for AI Search.

Schema Markup: The 8 Schemas Every OB/GYN Site Needs

Comprehensive medical schema is the highest-leverage technical change. Implementation typically produces measurable ranking and AI citation lift within 60–120 days.

1. MedicalClinic or MedicalOrganization on homepage with OB/GYN specialty designation, NPI of group, address, phone, hours, accepted insurance, accreditation.

2. Physician schema on each provider page with NPI, specialty taxonomy code (207V00000X for general OB/GYN, sub-specialty codes for FPMRS, MFM, GynOnc, REI), ABOG board certifications including sub-specialty certifications, fellowship program (named institution), hospital affiliations, professional society memberships (ACOG, AAGL, NAMS, AUGS, SMFM), procedures performed.

3. MedicalProcedure schema on each procedure page (Myomectomy, Hysterectomy, Endometrial Ablation, LEEP, Sacrocolpopexy, Sling Surgery, Laparoscopy, etc.) with name, description, body location, indication conditions, procedure type, recovery time, possible complications, physician performing.

4. MedicalCondition schema on each condition page (Uterine Fibroids, Endometriosis, Menopause, Perimenopause, PCOS, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Urinary Incontinence, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, etc.) with name, description, possible treatments, associated anatomy, risk factors, symptoms.

5. FAQPage schema on every page with FAQ content.

6. LocalBusiness with medical subtype on homepage and location pages.

7. BreadcrumbList schema on all interior pages.

8. Article schema with Physician author attribution on blog and educational content.

Verify implementation works: Test every page type with Google Rich Results Test. Zero errors, zero warnings, all expected schemas detected. If schema is in the editor but not detected by the test, it’s being stripped during page rendering — common with plugin-based implementations and a frequent reason that practices implement schema and see no AI citation lift.

See OB/GYN services →

Competing Against Hospital Systems and Corporate Practice Groups

Most OB/GYN private practices compete against hospital-owned systems (Sutter, Adventist, Dignity, Kaiser, HCA, Ascension, etc.) and increasingly against corporate practice groups (Axia Women’s Health, Unified Women’s Healthcare, etc.) for SEO visibility. The competitive dynamics are different from independent specialty practices competing against smaller competitors.

Where hospital systems and corporate groups have structural advantages: Massive domain authority on parent sites. Marketing budgets often $1M+/year for the entire system. Generic OB/GYN content depth across all conditions. Brand recognition. Insurance assignment routing (the structural piece).

Where private practices have structural advantages: Speed of decision-making and content publishing (hospital marketing teams move slowly through committee approval; a private practice can publish substantive content in days). Specialization depth (an FPMRS-credentialed urogynecologist publishing about pelvic prolapse outperforms generic hospital OB/GYN content). Provider authority specificity (named OB/GYN with credentials outranks anonymous “our team of OB/GYNs” positioning). Local pack visibility in sub-specialty terms (hospital systems often don’t compete strongly in “menopause specialist near me” or “fibroid specialist [city]”).

The strategy that works against hospital systems: Don’t compete on generic OB/GYN visibility — compete on sub-specialty visibility where hospital systems are under-investing. Don’t produce hospital-style generic women’s health content — produce specific, opinionated, provider-attributed content. Don’t hide your physicians behind brand-only positioning — name them with credentials and let them rank as individuals as well as the practice. The hospital system can’t move fast enough to defend every sub-specialty niche; private practices that pick their niche and dominate it win.

For the parallel framework in dental, read How to Compete with Corporate Dental and DSO Marketing as an Independent Practice — many of the same principles apply.

See what we’d build →

OB/GYN SEO Benchmarks

Cost per qualified lead (free consultation booking). Menopause and HRT cash-pay: $80–$180. Fibroid and gynecologic surgery consultation: $120–$280. Urogynecology / FPMRS: $100–$220. Aesthetic gynecology: $90–$200. Endometriosis specialty: $100–$240. General OB/GYN annual exam (paid search): $60–$150 if running paid (typically not the highest-leverage spend). High-density urban metros run 30–60% higher; tertiary markets run 20–40% lower.

Landing page conversion rate. Sub-specialty service pages on paid traffic should run 7–12% conversion to consultation booking. Below 4% indicates structural problems.

Consultation-to-procedure conversion. For surgical and high-LTV cash-pay services, 35–60% indicates competent consultation infrastructure. Below 25% indicates pricing presentation, financing options, or follow-up cadence problems.

Local Pack ranking timeline for sub-specialty terms. First improvements typically 60–120 days. Top-3 Local Pack position for sub-specialty terms typically achievable in 9–15 months from competitive starting positions.

Organic ranking timeline. Sub-specialty cluster pages typically begin ranking for primary queries at month 6–9. Mature organic ranking establishes at month 9–15. AI citation visibility on women’s health queries typically begins at month 3–6 with consistent appearance at month 9–12. Year 2 organic traffic typically runs 3–5× year 1.

Reasonable monthly investment. Single-provider OB/GYN practice: $3,500–$7,000/mo. Multi-provider practice with sub-specialty depth: $5,500–$11,000/mo. Multi-location regional women’s health group: $9,000–$18,000/mo.

Common OB/GYN SEO Mistakes

Competing for generic “OB/GYN near me” against hospital systems. The most common strategic mistake. Private practice budgets are better deployed on sub-specialty niches where competitive dynamics favor specialty depth.

Generic women’s health content from generalist agencies. Competes with Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, ACOG. Even when technically ranking, AI Overviews answer the query without sending traffic. Generic content is largely obsolete strategy in 2026.

Treating OB and GYN content as one cluster. Obstetric content serves a fundamentally different patient than gynecologic content. Sharing content architecture weakens both.

Weak sub-specialty entity signals. Provider pages that don’t explicitly call out sub-specialty credentials (FPMRS, MFM, GynOnc, NCMP, AAGL). NPI registry with general OB/GYN taxonomy instead of sub-specialty codes.

Under-investing in menopause content. Most OB/GYN practice sites have one thin menopause page. The cluster warrants 8–15 substantive pages.

Ignoring AI search visibility. Women’s health queries route through AI search at meaningfully higher rates than most medical specialties.

Skipping schema implementation. Most OB/GYN practice sites have no specialty schema or only basic LocalBusiness schema.

Generic provider bios. Don’t rank for provider-name searches against Healthgrades, Vitals, hospital directory listings.

Sporadic review collection. Local Pack ranking depends on sustained velocity. OB/GYN reviews benefit from treatment specificity over generic positive language.

Sensitive content tone problems. Cold clinical tone and aggressive sales language both underperform empathetic substantive content. Tone is a ranking factor indirectly through engagement signals.

Premature evaluation of compounding channels. Sub-specialty SEO compounds over 9–15 months. Practices cutting investment at month 6 kill programs that would have produced sustained patient flow.

Working with generalist agencies on specialty-intensive verticals. Read The Real Cost of a Bad Medical Marketing Agency for the structural cost analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does SEO work for OB/GYN practices?

Yes, but not the way most generic medical SEO agencies execute it. Generic OB/GYN SEO targeting insurance-routed patients (annual exams, general obstetric care) usually underperforms because hospital systems dominate that visibility. SEO targeting self-directing patient segments (menopause and HRT, fibroid and gynecologic surgery, urogynecology, aesthetic gynecology, endometriosis specialty care) consistently produces patient flow and meaningful ROI. The strategic pivot is the difference between SEO that works and SEO that doesn’t for OB/GYN.

What kind of content actually ranks for OB/GYN practices?

Substantive sub-specialty cluster pages: menopause and HRT (2,000–3,000 words per page), fibroid and gynecologic surgery (2,000–3,500), urogynecology / FPMRS (1,500–2,500), endometriosis specialty (2,000–3,000), aesthetic gynecology (1,500–2,500). Substantive provider pages (1,200–2,500 words per OB/GYN) with explicit sub-specialty credentials. Distinct content for self-directing patient segments. Comprehensive medical schema. Strong sub-specialty Local Pack signals.

How long does OB/GYN SEO take to produce results?

First ranking improvements typically visible 60–120 days after foundation work completes. Sub-specialty cluster pages begin ranking for primary queries at month 6–9. AI citation visibility on women’s health queries typically begins at month 3–6 with consistent appearance at month 9–12. Mature organic ranking and Local Pack position establishes at month 9–15.

How do I compete against Kaiser, Sutter, and other hospital systems for OB/GYN visibility?

Don’t compete on generic OB/GYN visibility — compete on sub-specialty niches where hospital systems are under-investing. Hospital systems dominate generic “OB/GYN [city]” through brand authority and insurance routing, but they typically under-invest in “menopause specialist [city],” “fibroid specialist [city],” “urogynecologist [city],” and similar sub-specialty terms.

What schema markup do OB/GYN practice websites need?

Eight schemas: MedicalClinic or MedicalOrganization with OB/GYN specialty designation, Physician schema on each provider page with NPI and sub-specialty credentials, MedicalProcedure on each procedure page, MedicalCondition on each condition page, FAQPage on every page with FAQ content, LocalBusiness with medical subtype, BreadcrumbList on interior pages, and Article with Physician author attribution on blog content.

How important is the menopause content cluster specifically?

The single highest-leverage cluster for most OB/GYN private practices in 2026. Menopause patients self-direct intensively, increasingly evaluate cash-pay specialty care, and have $2,500–$8,000+ LTV per patient through sustained HRT management. NAMS Certified Menopause Practitioner (NCMP) credentialing strongly weighted by search systems and AI citation. Most OB/GYN sites have one thin menopause page; the cluster warrants 8–15 substantive pages.

Should OB/GYN practices invest in AI search optimization?

Yes — women’s health queries are among the heaviest AI search categories in healthcare (40–60% of relevant research queries route partially or entirely through ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews). First citation appearances typically visible 60–120 days after foundation work completes. First-mover advantage is meaningful through 2026 because few OB/GYN practices are actively optimizing for AI citation.

How much should an OB/GYN practice spend on SEO?

Single-provider OB/GYN practice: $3,500–$7,000/mo for SEO and content. Multi-provider practice with sub-specialty depth: $5,500–$11,000/mo. Multi-location regional women’s health group: $9,000–$18,000/mo. Year 2 organic traffic typically runs 3–5× year 1.

How does OB/GYN SEO differ from general medical SEO?

Most patient routing is insurance-driven rather than search-driven, which means generic OB/GYN SEO underperforms. Self-directing patient segments concentrate in specific sub-specialty niches (menopause, fibroid surgery, urogynecology, aesthetic gynecology) rather than general OB/GYN. Sub-specialty entity signals (FPMRS, MFM, GynOnc, NCMP, AAGL) matter more than general board certification. Hospital system competition dominates generic visibility but typically under-invests in sub-specialty niches.

Should OB/GYN practices separate obstetric and gynecologic content?

Yes — structurally critical. Obstetric content serves pregnant patients researching prenatal care, delivery, complications, postpartum — a fundamentally different audience than the gynecologic surgery, menopause, or urogynecology audiences. Separate content architectures with distinct topic clusters perform better than combined “women’s health” content.

What if my OB/GYN practice doesn’t offer sub-specialty services?

Three strategic options: (1) add sub-specialty capability (NAMS Certified Menopause Practitioner certification is achievable in 6–12 months for any OB/GYN willing to invest), (2) compete in adjacent procedure-research niches where general OB/GYN content can still rank (LEEP, colposcopy, IUD insertion procedures), or (3) accept that SEO will be a smaller channel for the practice and emphasize other patient acquisition channels like physician referral marketing and reputation density. The first option typically produces the strongest sustained SEO and patient acquisition outcomes.

Built for OB/GYN sub-specialty SEO compounding

Stop fighting hospital systems for generic OB/GYN visibility.

Free 30-minute strategy call. No pitch deck. No slides. An honest look at your sub-specialty positioning, self-directing patient segment opportunity, content architecture gaps, AI citation readiness, and the highest-leverage next moves for your practice.

Book your strategy call →

Or request a free written OB/GYN SEO audit