PPC Management for Orthopedic Surgeons

A Specialty PPC Agency Built for Orthopedic Surgical Practices — Not a Generalist Google Ads Vendor

Tandem Medical Marketing builds and operates Google Ads, Meta, and paid search programs specifically for orthopedic surgical practices. Procedure-segmented campaign architecture across joint replacement, sports medicine, spine, hand, foot, and regenerative medicine; HIPAA-compliant conversion tracking; attribution windows calibrated to 3–9 month orthopedic surgical decision cycles; long-cycle nurture infrastructure; transparent flat-fee pricing. No long-term contracts, no inflated KPIs, no generalist execution.

Why Orthopedic PPC Needs Specialty Agency Execution

Orthopedic surgery isn’t one specialty for marketing purposes — it’s six or seven loosely related ones running side by side under one orthopedic group umbrella. Joint replacement (55–80 year-old patients on Medicare and commercial insurance, Facebook-dominant audience, 4–9 month decision cycle, $30K–$60K case revenue). Sports medicine (25–55, Instagram and YouTube-heavy, shorter cycle, $8K–$25K case revenue). Spine surgery (40–70, longest decision cycle of any orthopedic sub-specialty, $30K–$80K case revenue, highest CPC environment). Hand and foot (symptom-driven specific-condition searches, 45–75 demographic, $5K–$15K case revenue). And then regenerative medicine running entirely outside the surgical funnel — cash-pay, $1,500–$8,000 per treatment, patients in problem-solving mode trying to avoid surgery rather than evaluating surgical options.

The generic Google Ads agency running a single “orthopedic surgery” campaign across all of these is producing predictable mediocrity across all of them. The algorithm can’t optimize against mixed-procedure noise. The landing pages can’t serve six different patient psychologies. The bidding can’t calibrate against five different CPC ranges. The attribution can’t measure success when half the patients convert in 30 days (regenerative) and half take 4–9 months (surgical). And the conversion infrastructure is built for whichever procedure the agency happened to set up first, not for the procedure mix the practice actually runs.

A specialty orthopedic PPC agency isn’t a luxury at the LTV levels orthopedic surgical practices operate at — it’s the difference between paid search that compounds across the procedure portfolio and paid search that runs at 30–50% of potential because the calibration is wrong on every dimension. The practices that grow consistently through PPC in 2026 are working with agencies that built specialty depth in orthopedic before they sold a contract.

What We Do for Orthopedic Practices

Full-stack paid search built specifically for orthopedic surgical practices.

Which Orthopedic Sub-Procedures We Build PPC For

Orthopedic surgery isn’t one campaign category — it’s a federation of procedure categories with meaningfully different patient demographics, decision cycles, CPC ranges, and channel preferences. Generic orthopedic Google Ads campaigns that bundle everything into “orthopedic surgery” consistently underperform compared to procedure-segmented architecture.

Joint replacement (hip, knee, shoulder). Patient demographic 55–80. CPC $8–$25. Highest case LTV ($30K–$60K). Decision cycle 4–9 months from first symptom search to surgery. Facebook is dominant for awareness and consideration in this age group; Google search captures bottom-of-funnel high-intent queries. Robotic-assisted positioning (Mako, ROSA, Velys) deserves dedicated campaigns — the technology-specific searcher is pre-qualified for the procedure and converts at materially higher rates than generic procedure searches. Same-day or expedited surgery messaging is a real differentiator over hospital-system orthopedic groups with longer queues.

Sports medicine (ACL, meniscus, rotator cuff, labral repair). Patient demographic 25–55. CPC $6–$18. Case LTV $8K–$25K. Decision cycle 1–4 months — meaningfully shorter than other orthopedic surgical categories. Instagram and YouTube perform unusually well because athletes and recreational competitors research procedure videos and return-to-sport timelines. Symptom-driven search dominant (“torn ACL recovery time,” “meniscus surgery near me”). Return-to-sport timeline content is the highest-converting content category in orthopedic.

Spine surgery. Patient demographic 40–70. Highest CPC environment in orthopedic ($10–$30). Longest decision cycle (4–9 months typical, longer for complex revision and motion preservation). Case LTV $30K–$80K+. Spine is increasingly its own specialty marketing program rather than one orthopedic procedure category among many — for spine-heavy practices, we typically run spine as a separate engagement with dedicated calibration. Full tactical depth in Spine Surgeon Digital Marketing Services.

Hand surgery. Patient demographic 45–75. CPC $5–$15. Case LTV $5K–$15K. Google search dominant. Symptom-driven specific-condition searches (“trigger finger surgery,” “carpal tunnel release near me,” “Dupuytren’s contracture treatment”). Limited social media payoff. Lower-LTV category but lower competitive density and lower CPL produces strong unit economics for hand-specialty practices.

Foot and ankle. Patient demographic 35–70. CPC $5–$15. Case LTV $5K–$15K. Google search dominant. Specific-condition searches (“bunion surgery,” “plantar fasciitis surgery,” “ankle replacement”). Podiatry differentiation matters — the orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon needs to position explicitly against podiatry for the same procedures.

Regenerative medicine (PRP, stem cell, BMAC, exosome). Patient demographic 40–65. CPC $8–$20. $1,500–$8,000 per treatment, mostly cash-pay, with most patients buying multi-treatment series. The patient psychology is opposite of surgical (“I want to avoid surgery” rather than “I need surgery”); the conversion path is different (cash-pay decision in days vs insurance-track decision in months); the ad copy that converts is different. Must run as separate campaigns, separate landing pages, separate intake. The highest-margin segment in modern orthopedic, and the most under-marketed.

Pediatric orthopedics. For practices offering pediatric ortho. Parent-driven research, condition-specific (scoliosis, hip dysplasia, adolescent sports injuries). Lower volume than adult procedures but produces sustained referral relationships with general pediatric and primary care.

Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC) marketing. For orthopedic groups with affiliated ASC operations. Distinct positioning around outpatient surgical experience, recovery in home environment, lower out-of-pocket cost than hospital-based procedures. ASC patient acquisition operates with payer mix optimization, surgeon recruitment marketing, and procedure-specific positioning that traditional practice marketing doesn’t fully address.

We don’t take every type of orthopedic practice. If your practice is primarily insurance-routed with limited self-directing or cash-pay patient base, we’ll tell you on the strategy call whether PPC investment makes sense for your specific situation. For broader orthopedic agency services beyond paid search, our full agency framework is at Orthopedic Marketing Agency.

Request a free audit →

How We Work

The methodology that separates specialty orthopedic PPC execution from generalist Google Ads management. Practices considering us should understand how we operate before deciding whether the fit is right.

Audit-first engagement

Every engagement starts with a written audit — either the standalone $750 audit, or as the first 30 days of a full engagement. We don’t commit to campaign architecture before diagnosing the current state. Most orthopedic practices we onboard have meaningful conversion infrastructure issues that need to be fixed before campaign spend produces meaningful results — landing page conversion rates running at 1–2% on paid traffic when 7–10% is achievable, mixed-procedure campaigns that prevent algorithmic optimization, attribution windows calibrated for short-cycle decisions when surgical conversions land at month 4–9. Fixing infrastructure first is dramatically cheaper than optimizing around it.

Procedure-segmented campaign architecture

The single highest-leverage tactical move in orthopedic PPC. Joint replacement, sports medicine, spine, hand, foot, and regenerative medicine each get separate campaigns with separate ad groups, separate landing pages, and separate creative. Within categories, further segmentation by specific procedure (total knee vs total hip vs shoulder replacement; ACL vs meniscus vs rotator cuff; cervical fusion vs lumbar fusion vs decompression). For multi-procedure orthopedic practices, expect 8–20 active campaigns at scale. Less than that is under-segmented and prevents the algorithm from optimizing against any single procedure category cleanly.

Regenerative funnel run separately from surgical

Regenerative medicine cannot share campaigns with traditional orthopedic surgery. The patient psychology is different, the conversion path is different, the ad copy that converts is different, and the LTV math is different. We run regenerative as its own campaign cluster with dedicated landing pages per treatment type (PRP, stem cell, BMAC, exosome), conditions-led keyword targeting (“alternatives to knee replacement,” “avoid back surgery”), transparent pricing on landing pages, and FDA-compliant outcome content. Best-case execution targets $80–$200 cost per consultation booking on regenerative against $4,500–$8,000 average first-treatment revenue and 40–60% repeat treatment rate.

Attribution windows calibrated to orthopedic surgical cycles

Orthopedic surgical decision cycles run 3–9 months for elective procedures. We measure campaign performance against 90–180-day attribution windows for consultation conversion and 4–9 month windows for surgical case conversion. Reports show consultation flow now, projected surgical conversions in 90 days, and the campaign math at both the consultation and surgical-case-conversion stages separately. Generic agencies running 30-day attribution on orthopedic campaigns systematically report failure on programs that are actually producing patients — they kill campaigns at month 2 before the patients who started researching at month 1 have had time to book consultation, let alone schedule surgery.

HIPAA-compliant tracking infrastructure

Standard Google Ads and Meta conversion tracking configurations typically violate HIPAA. Orthopedic practices are exposed because patient inquiries often include condition specifics in form submissions and call recordings. We build compliant infrastructure: conversion-event-only tracking (not PHI), server-side implementation via Enhanced Conversions and Meta Conversions API, BAA agreements with all relevant vendors (CallRail, Twilio, analytics tools), audience configuration that doesn’t target inferred health conditions, dynamic number insertion for keyword-level call attribution that doesn’t send PHI back to advertising platforms. Most generic Google Ads agencies set up conversion tracking that technically violates HIPAA without realizing it.

Long-cycle nurture infrastructure

The single most under-invested area in orthopedic marketing. Most practices spend aggressively on lead acquisition and let leads sit untouched after the initial consultation request, losing patients to competitors during the 3–9 month decision window. We build sustained nurture: procedure-specific email sequences, long-cycle retargeting display, educational content hubs, reactivation campaigns for older leads, phone follow-up cadence. Best-case scenario: well-executed retargeting and email nurture recovers 15–25% of leads that didn’t initially convert — patients who returned to research the procedure and chose the practice that stayed visible.

Hospital system and academic center competitive positioning

If your market includes Hospital for Special Surgery, Mayo Clinic Orthopedics, Cleveland Clinic, Steadman Clinic, Andrews Sports Medicine, or any major academic medical center orthopedic program, you’re competing against marketing budgets you can’t match dollar-for-dollar. We compete on execution discipline: hyper-local landing pages, surgeon-specific positioning (fellowship training, procedure volume, accessibility) over institutional brand promotion, brand bidding on academic center search terms (legal as long as the trademark isn’t used in ad copy), specific accessibility messaging (“same-week consultations,” “direct surgeon access”), and outcome data with proper FDA-compliant framing. Academic centers are governance-constrained in ways independents aren’t.

Month-to-month engagement, no long-term contracts

Most medical marketing agencies require 12-month contracts. We don’t. Engagements are month-to-month with 30-day notice. The structural reason: if we’re producing meaningful results, you have no reason to leave. If we’re not, you shouldn’t be stuck. Long-term contracts protect agencies, not clients.

Transparent reporting

Monthly reports show: spend by channel and procedure-segmented campaign, CPL by procedure category (joint replacement, sports medicine, spine, regenerative, etc.), conversion-to-consultation rate, consultation-to-surgical-case conversion rate (where you provide data), attribution by source for the eventual surgical cases (often weeks or months after the initial click), call tracking analytics with keyword-level attribution, and any infrastructure issues identified during the month. No inflated vanity metrics. No “impressions delivered” as a success metric.

What We Don’t Do

Specialty orthopedic PPC agencies serve some practices well and aren’t the right fit for others. Honest about both sides:

We don’t take every practice that asks. If your orthopedic practice is primarily insurance-routed with limited self-directing or cash-pay patient base — very small general practice serving primarily existing patient relationships, hospital-employed orthopedic with patient routing through the system, low-volume general practice without sub-specialty positioning — PPC investment will underperform regardless of agency quality. We’ll tell you that on the strategy call.

We don’t require 12-month contracts. Month-to-month engagements. 30-day notice.

We don’t inflate KPIs. No “impressions delivered” success metrics, no vanity ranking reports for terms patients don’t search, no “leads generated” metrics that count form fills with no follow-through. We report on the metrics that drive surgical case revenue and regenerative treatment revenue.

We don’t run one campaign across all procedures. The single most universal failure pattern in orthopedic PPC. Joint replacement, sports medicine, spine, hand, foot, and regenerative each get separate campaigns. Bundling them prevents the algorithm from optimizing for any single category.

We don’t handle non-medical verticals. Tandem Medical Marketing serves medical specialty practices exclusively.

We don’t skip conversion infrastructure work. Optimizing campaign-level CPC while landing page conversion runs at 1–2% leaves 3–6× potential patient flow on the table. If conversion infrastructure isn’t built, we fix that before scaling campaign spend.

We don’t use form-fill-only conversion tracking. 50–65% of qualified orthopedic leads come via phone. Without keyword-level call attribution via dynamic number insertion, bidding optimizes against incomplete data and campaigns underperform structurally.

We don’t promise specific case volume numbers. Variables outside our control — scheduling capacity, payer mix, market dynamics, seasonal patient flow, surgeon availability — meaningfully affect outcomes. We promise specialty execution, transparent reporting, and honest assessment. We don’t promise “30 new surgical cases per quarter” or similar fabricated outcome guarantees.

Specialty Depth: How to Evaluate an Orthopedic PPC Agency

Most orthopedic practices we audit are working with an agency that claims orthopedic expertise. The difference between agencies that have it and agencies that say they do is usually visible in the first conversation, but here’s the diagnostic framework for evaluating any orthopedic PPC management agency — including us.

Ask about procedure segmentation specifically. Specific question: “How will you structure the campaign architecture differently for joint replacement vs sports medicine vs spine vs regenerative medicine? How many active campaigns do you expect to run at scale for a multi-procedure practice?” If the answer is “we’ll run an orthopedic campaign with separate ad groups,” the depth isn’t there. The right answer is 8–20 separate campaigns with procedure-specific landing pages, separate creative, and separate negative keyword lists.

Ask about regenerative medicine separation. Specifically: “How will you handle PRP, stem cell, and BMAC campaigns vs traditional surgical campaigns? What’s the difference in landing page approach, intake process, and pricing transparency between the two?” If the agency treats regenerative as just another orthopedic procedure category, they’ll underperform on it dramatically.

Ask about HIPAA-compliant tracking. Specifically: “Do you sign a Business Associate Agreement? How do you handle conversion tracking without sending PHI to Google or Meta? What’s your server-side tracking implementation for Enhanced Conversions and CAPI? How do you handle call recordings where patients self-identify their conditions?” A generic agency will deflect. A specialty agency will have a direct technical answer.

Ask about attribution windows. Specifically: “What attribution window do you use for joint replacement vs sports medicine vs spine campaigns? How do you measure success at month 3 when surgical case conversions land at month 4–9? How do you handle the mix of short-cycle regenerative (30–60 days) and long-cycle surgical (4–9 months) in one orthopedic practice?” If the answer is “30-day attribution across the board,” the agency isn’t calibrated for orthopedic.

Ask about robotic-assisted surgery positioning. Specifically: “Will you run dedicated campaigns for Mako, ROSA, or Velys robotic-assisted procedures? How does that differ from generic joint replacement campaign targeting?” Practices with robotic capability that don’t run technology-specific campaigns leave high-intent search traffic on the table. Robotic-specific queries convert at materially higher rates than generic procedure searches.

Ask about long-cycle nurture infrastructure. Specifically: “What email sequences, retargeting display, and reactivation campaigns do you build for the 3–9 month surgical decision cycle?” Marketing programs that capture leads but don’t nurture them across the orthopedic decision window lose 30–50% of attributable pipeline to competitors.

Ask about call tracking and attribution. Specifically: “What call tracking platform do you implement? Do you set up dynamic number insertion for keyword-level call attribution? How do you upload offline conversions back to Google Ads for Smart Bidding optimization?” 50–65% of orthopedic leads come via phone — agencies that don’t track them are bidding blind.

Ask about academic center competitive positioning. If your market includes HSS, Mayo, Cleveland Clinic, Steadman, Andrews, or major hospital system orthopedic programs, ask: “How will you compete against academic centers on PPC? Will you brand-bid on their search terms? What’s your strategy for differentiating on accessibility and surgeon-specific positioning?” Generic agencies will fold; specialty agencies have a specific playbook.

Book a strategy call →

Pricing

Transparent pricing for the work that matters. No hidden setup fees, no minimums beyond what’s listed.

Marketing audit (standalone): $750 flat. 5-business-day written report. Full diagnostic with prioritized 90-day orthopedic PPC roadmap. No obligation to engage further.

Google Ads management: $1,250/mo or 12% of ad spend (whichever is higher). Includes procedure-segmented campaign architecture, service-specific landing page strategy, HIPAA-compliant tracking implementation, attribution window calibration to orthopedic surgical cycles, regenerative funnel separation, ongoing optimization, and monthly reporting.

Meta and Instagram (additive to Google Ads): $750/mo. Includes campaign architecture, audience configuration calibrated to orthopedic demographic mix (Facebook for joint replacement, Instagram for sports medicine), CAPI implementation, retargeting infrastructure for long surgical decision cycles.

Consulting (strategic advisory): $150–$250/hr depending on scope. Hourly engagement, monthly retainer, or project-based for larger orthopedic groups with internal marketing capability.

What’s not included: Ad spend itself (paid directly to Google, Meta, etc.), third-party tool subscriptions (CallRail, Twilio, analytics platforms) if you don’t already have them, and one-time conversion infrastructure builds (priced separately during onboarding based on diagnostic).

Typical CPL benchmarks by procedure (for realistic expectations during engagement evaluation): joint replacement $200–$450, sports medicine $150–$350, spine $250–$500, hand and foot $120–$280, regenerative cash-pay $80–$200. Tier-1 metros (NYC, SF, LA, Boston, Chicago, Miami) run 30–60% higher; tertiary markets run 20–40% lower. The metric that matters more than CPL is sustained ROAS — $400 CPL on a $35K total knee replacement at 20% lead-to-surgery rate is one of the strongest unit economics in healthcare.

Multi-channel engagements for orthopedic practices typically come in at $3,000–$6,000/mo all-in for the full PPC management stack at typical orthopedic practice spend levels. Multi-surgeon groups and ASC-affiliated practices add roughly 30–60% per additional dimension (additional location, additional surgical capability, additional sub-specialty layer).

How to Engage

Three ways to start, depending on where your orthopedic practice is in the evaluation process.

1. Strategy call (free, 30 minutes). Direct conversation about your procedure mix, current PPC situation, where the pain points are, and what we’d realistically build over a 90-day rebuild. No pitch deck, no slides. Honest assessment of whether we’re the right fit. Book a strategy call.

2. Marketing audit ($750 flat, standalone engagement). Full written diagnostic delivered in 5 business days. Audit covers current Google Ads architecture across orthopedic procedures, Meta position, conversion infrastructure, HIPAA-compliant tracking status, attribution setup, regenerative funnel status, and competitive content gap. Includes prioritized 90-day roadmap. Request an audit.

3. Full engagement (month-to-month management). After audit or strategy call, full engagement typically starts within 14–21 days with onboarding scoped during the audit. First 30 days focused on infrastructure fixes and procedure-segmented campaign architecture. Performance reporting on consultation conversions starts at month 2; surgical case conversion reporting starts at month 4–9 given orthopedic attribution cycles. Month-to-month with 30-day notice.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes you an orthopedic PPC agency vs a general medical marketing agency?

Specialty depth in calibration, not just clinical familiarity. Orthopedic PPC has specialty-specific dynamics: procedure-segmented campaign architecture across joint replacement, sports medicine, spine, hand, foot, and regenerative; demographic-matched channel mix (Facebook for joint replacement 55–80, Instagram for sports medicine 25–55); 3–9 month surgical decision cycles requiring extended attribution windows; cash-pay regenerative funnel separation from surgical; robotic-assisted positioning as distinct campaign layer; long-cycle nurture infrastructure for the surgical decision window. We built specialty depth in orthopedic before we ran client campaigns. Generic medical agencies typically run the same playbook across dermatology, dental, orthopedic, and three other specialties.

How much should an orthopedic practice spend on PPC management per month?

Single-surgeon practices typically need $5,000–$10,000/mo in ad spend plus management fees. Multi-surgeon group practices run $10,000–$30,000/mo in ad spend. Multi-location regional orthopedic groups operate at $30,000–$80,000/mo. ASC-affiliated and academic-adjacent practices run higher. The right budget is driven by patient value math: a practice with $30K average per-patient surgical revenue can support higher CPL than the broader medical marketing benchmark suggests.

What is a good cost per lead for orthopedic PPC?

CPL varies dramatically by procedure: joint replacement $200–$450, sports medicine $150–$350, spine $250–$500, hand and foot $120–$280, regenerative cash-pay $80–$200. Tier-1 US metros run 30–60% higher than mid-tier metros. The metric that matters more than CPL is cost-per-surgery, which typically lands at $1,500–$4,000 against $15K–$60K per-patient surgical revenue. Sustainable ROAS of 4–7× is the right target across most orthopedic procedures.

Do you require long-term contracts?

No. Month-to-month engagement with 30-day notice. Most agencies require 12-month contracts as protection against client departures. We don’t. If we’re producing meaningful results, you have no reason to leave. If we’re not, you shouldn’t be stuck.

Should orthopedic practices run separate campaigns by procedure?

Yes — it’s the highest-leverage tactical move in orthopedic PPC. Joint replacement, sports medicine, spine, hand, foot, and regenerative medicine each have different patient demographics, different CPC, different conversion behavior, and different ad copy that converts. A single “orthopedic” campaign prevents the algorithm from optimizing for any of them. Multi-procedure practices should run 8–20 active campaigns at minimum.

How does PPC for regenerative medicine differ from traditional orthopedic surgery?

Completely different patient psychology and economics. Regenerative medicine (PRP, stem cell, BMAC, exosome) is mostly cash-pay, $1,500–$8,000 per treatment, with patients in problem-solving mode trying to avoid surgery. Traditional orthopedic surgery is insurance-driven with patients in decision mode after diagnosis. The two require separate landing pages, ad campaigns, intake processes, and sales conversations. Generic orthopedic marketing programs typically under-serve the regenerative segment dramatically — leaving the highest-margin revenue in the practice on the table.

Do you provide HIPAA-compliant tracking?

Yes. Standard Google Ads and Meta tracking typically send PHI to advertising platforms, violating HIPAA. We build compliant infrastructure: conversion-event-only tracking, server-side implementation via Enhanced Conversions and Meta Conversions API, BAA agreements with vendors (call tracking platforms, analytics tools), audience configuration that doesn’t target inferred health conditions, dynamic number insertion for keyword-level call attribution that doesn’t leak condition data.

How can independent orthopedic practices compete with academic medical centers like HSS or Mayo?

Not on budget. Independents win on execution discipline: hyper-local landing pages that name the neighborhood, surgeon-specific positioning (fellowship training, procedure volume, accessibility) over institutional brand promotion, brand bidding on academic center search terms (legal as long as the trademark isn’t used in ad copy), specific accessibility messaging (“same-week consultations,” “direct surgeon access”), and outcome data with proper FDA-compliant framing. Academic centers are governance-constrained in ways independents aren’t.

How long does it take to see results from orthopedic PPC?

Regenerative cash-pay: first attributable patients 14–30 days, sustained flow 60–90 days. Sports medicine: first consultations 30–60 days, surgical case conversions 1–4 months. Joint replacement: first consultations 30–90 days, surgical case conversions at month 4–9 given decision cycle. Spine: first consultations 60–120 days, surgical case conversions at month 6–9. Conversion infrastructure improvements typically produce measurable conversion rate lift within 30 days. Practices that cut investment at month 3 because they don’t yet see surgical case conversions kill programs that would have produced patients with proper runway.

How important is robotic-assisted surgery messaging in orthopedic PPC?

Increasingly important. Patients researching joint replacement actively search for Mako, ROSA, Velys, and similar robotic platform terms. Practices offering robotic-assisted procedures should run dedicated campaigns targeting these searches — they convert at materially higher rates than generic procedure campaigns because the searcher is specifically pre-qualified for the technology. Marketing programs that bury robotic capability on a generic procedure page miss the high-intent search traffic.

Can you take over from our current PPC agency without disrupting active campaigns?

Yes — transition engagement typically runs 30–45 days with parallel operation during the first 14–21 days. Audit-first onboarding identifies what’s working and shouldn’t be disrupted, what’s broken and needs immediate fixing, and what infrastructure changes are required before full optimization can begin. Most orthopedic practices we onboard come from prior agency relationships — the transition path is well-mapped.

Where are you located? Do you work with orthopedic practices nationally?

Tandem Medical Marketing is based in Sacramento, California. We work with orthopedic practices nationally. Specialty depth doesn’t require geographic proximity. Most client relationships operate via video calls, written reports, and shared dashboards.

How do I get started?

Two paths. (1) Free 30-minute strategy call — direct conversation about your practice situation, no obligation. Book on calendar. (2) $750 marketing audit — written diagnostic delivered in 5 business days, useful as standalone insight even if you don’t engage further. Request audit.

Built for orthopedic surgical practices

Stop running one Google Ads campaign for six different procedures.

Free 30-minute strategy call. No pitch deck. No slides. Honest assessment of your procedure mix, current PPC architecture, regenerative funnel status, conversion infrastructure gaps, and the highest-leverage next moves for your practice.

Book a strategy call →

Or request a free written PPC audit